Advancing against the odds: Lessons from CEE and SEE ranking leapfroggers

The report examines the global ranking dynamics of CEE & SEE universities and highlights a select group of institutions that managed to improve their results substantially and outlines the underlying best practices that drove their success.

Advancing against the odds: Lessons from CEE and SEE ranking leapfroggers

Executive Summary

Approximately one in three CEE and SEE universities appearing in the same subject ranking five years ago and today have risen substantially, strengthening their position as international challengers.

This is notable because the upper tiers remain highly stable and dominated by the Anglosphere, an advancing East Asia, and the strongest Western and Northern European systems—broadly reflecting the global distribution of economic resources and academic influence.

We analysed six years of ranking data to identify “leapfrogger universities” that progressed despite competing with significantly better-funded peers. Based on interviews and analysis of their research performance, visibility and strategic development, four lessons emerge:

  1. 1. Structural disadvantages make strategic focus essential.

    Broad-based efforts are unlikely to overcome differences in resources and reputation. Universities need to concentrate investment where they have the strongest potential to advance.

  2. 2. Meaningful improvements are possible within a single ranking cycle.

    Stronger institutional housekeeping, reliable data and clear responsibilities, ensures that performance is accurately captured. Focused visibility management makes existing strengths more recognisable internationally.

  3. 3. Substantial progress requires sustained institutional development.

    Over a three- to four-year horizon, capability development can strengthen research performance and educational quality, while ecosystem positioning through alliances and partnerships expands access to talent, knowledge, resources and reputation.

  4. 4. Each leapfrogger follows an institution-specific path.

    Successful examples provide direction but cannot be replicated mechanically. Each university must identify its distinctive strategic assets and build a focused approach around them.

Key Numbers

CEE and SEE universities in the QS subject top 200

26 → 42

Between 2020–2026, +62%

Rest of Europe universities in the QS subject top 200

392 → 446

2020–2026 · +14%

Regional universities that leapfrogged

22 of 65

Approximately one in three

Leapfrogger
A university that reached a meaningful ranking position after substantial improvement since 2020.
Growth in top-200 subject-ranking representation
CEE and SEE +62%
Rest of Europe +14%
Leapfrogger universities by country
Poland 5
Hungary 5
Czechia 4
Greece 3
Romania 3
Estonia 1
Slovenia 1

Source: Solutions Lab analysis of QS and THE rankings, 2020–2026.

PERSONALIZED INSIGHTS

Interested in a personalized report for your institution?

Register your interest and we can contact you about an institution-specific analysis.

  • A tailored benchmark against comparable institutions
  • An analysis of ranking strengths and improvement opportunities
  • Practical recommendations tailored to your institution

This does not start another download. We will use your address only for this follow-up.

/ GET IN TOUCH /

Contact Us

Have a question or project in mind? We'd love to hear from you.